Disputes between builders and homebuyers in the Maharashtra that went to mediation were successfully settled, preventing time-consuming litigation in RERA Authority.

TN-RERA has recently passed an order to the builder to refund the amount with interest along with Rs. 75,000 for compensation and litigation expenses against the Developer for not providing the documents.

UP-RERA has taken this step to ensure that homebuyers’ interests are effectively protected and that the RERA Act’s provisions are followed.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court has followed the strict approach while dealing with the issue of limitation period of 45 days in filing reply for the complaint as stipulated under the Section 13(1)(a) of the Act.

Bihar-RERA issued an interim order in a case where it froze the bank accounts of a construction company and its directors.

The NCLT and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) have to ensure that they do not usurp the legitimate jurisdiction of other courts, tribunals and for when the dispute is one which does not arise solely from or relate to the insolvency of the Corporate Debtor.

RajRERA Authority issued more than 300 notices to the developers in light of the delay in project completion and is all set to issue more notices to the concerned new developers.

UPRERA has imposed a cumulative penalty of over Rs 1.93 crore to 14 promoters over non-compliance of its orders under Section 63 of the RERA Act.

The Authority has stopped the builder to make any changes in the sanctioned plan without the approval of the 2/3rd buyer as given under Section 14 of the RERA Act, 2016.

UP RERA recently passed an order making it mandatory for all the developers to mention the Registration number in the advertisement along with a link to RERA website.

Strict action has been taken as two projects of Ansal API has been de-registered by the UPRERA Authority after the promoter could not provide a satisfactory response to the notices sent by the Authority.

A perfect decision by the SC where the parties perform activities to avoid any commercial transactions which are collusive in nature or where financial creditor escape the bar under Section 21(2) first proviso of the IBC.

Hon’ble High Court once again demonstrated its power to command the concerned authorities to execute the process of law and to grant relief to the innocent.

The authority should take proper cognizance and ensure compliance of Recovery Certificates by builders and protect the interest of homebuyers.

A group of villagers, from whom Today Homes got land, took physical possession of the project and put up a notice at the gate of the nearly fully booked but incomplete housing society.