The Newtech Promoters and Developer filed an appeal before Supreme Court against an Allahabad High Court order which dismissed its plea against an order of a single member of the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority.
The Supreme Court has finally settled the law and has provided relief to all the allottees which were being regularly harassed by the builders under the shed of one sided clauses in the Apartment Buyer’s Agreements.
RERA Act grants the remedy to the homebuyers where they can file a complaint under section 31 of RERA Act and can claim interest for delay in possession by the developers. Homebuyers must seek legal assistance without delaying.
It is important to frame a model builder-buyer agreement to seek out transparency and uniformity and to protect the interest of homebuyers and consumers from builders’ unfair practices.
Section 18(1) of the RERA Act provides for ‘Return of amount and compensation’ which is the base for complaint under section 31 seeking refund, interest and compensation.
We always talk about problems that we face. Let’s talk about the remedy this time. A good legal team will help you in getting justice on time with an effective remedy. Finding the right legal remedy for your dispute is all what you seek during this chaos.
Everyone wishes to live peacefully in a well maintained house of their choice and that is why they invest their life time hard earned money in big projects developed by builders. But does it really fulfill their dreams?
Disputes between builders and homebuyers in the Maharashtra that went to mediation were successfully settled, preventing time-consuming litigation in RERA Authority.
Homebuyers were promised possession years ago but till date thousands of them are still waiting to get the possession and have faith in the system to get justice.
A group of villagers, from whom Today Homes got land, took physical possession of the project and put up a notice at the gate of the nearly fully booked but incomplete housing society.
The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 provides for redress against unfair trade practices and a false or misleading advertisement becomes an unfair trade practice under the provisions of the law.
MREAT directed the developers to refund the forfeited amount of Rs. 8.14 lakhs to Jagdish Patel and Pravin Patel within two months.
Bihar RERA authority has taken Suo-Motu cognizance against five promoters and builders with the highest number of complaints.
If the builder is delaying in giving possession or not giving the property as per the agreements there are some effective legal remedies for the aggrieved homebuyers under the law.
In UP RERA, a separate department has now been made to look into the matters where the execution of the order has not been done.
join For Updates