India winning NPA War steadily- Bhushan Steel puts Rs.36,400 crore in Bank, a way to recovery
NPA War: The major buyout of debt-ridden Bhushan Steel by a Tata Group company and many more to come under the Narendra Modi-led government’s IBC reform.
Search Results for: NCLT proceedings
Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016- Background
The old and archaic provisions to deal with sickness arising out of financial difficulties have been replaced by Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Powers and Fees of liquidation professional as liquidator
Their powers are extensive and under their purview the liquidation process of a corporate person is carried out.
Liquidation of Corporate Person- A way to recover bad debts
In this article we have discussed about liquidation, its initiation, contents and when Adjudicating Authorities can pass an order for it.
Essar Steel- What led to the landmark case under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Laws?
Amongst the 11 high profile case under the purview of Insolvency Code, Essar Steel has attracted a lot of attention.
What is Moratorium and public announcement?
Once NCLT has issued moratorium under section 14 of Insolvency Code in respect of Company in liquidation, Bank cannot pursue proceedings for recovery of loan.
Innoventive vs ICICI Bank- Supreme Court settles the law; Centre’s Insolvency Code to override all conflicting Acts
The judgement of the Supreme Court, in the case of Innoventive Industries vs ICICI Bank is a shot in the arm for the regime established under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
Robust Insolvency Bankruptcy Laws to deal with bad Loans
The latest amendment bill of Insolvency & Bankruptcy, 2017 has been passed by the Lok Sabha to deal with recovery and reorganization in a speedy, reliable process.
Banks can take advantage of the IBC to easy up their balance
The Reserve Bank of India has suggested banks to report for insolvency complaints on their very own rather than watching for its commands.
SC refuses to grant more time to Jaiprakash Associates for depositing Rs125 crore.
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to grant extension of time to Jaiprakash Associates Ltd (JAL) to deposit Rs125 crore. The amount is to be deposited by the end of this month. JAL was seeking time until 31 January to deposit Rs125 crore. As of now, the company’s liability is Rs1,525 crores. “Comply with … Continue reading “SC refuses to grant more time to Jaiprakash Associates for depositing Rs125 crore.”
join For Updates