RERA Imposes Rs 2.5 Crs penalty on developers for failure to comply the RERA orders
UPRERA Authority has imposed penalty of Rs 2.5 crore against 11 developers for failing to comply with the authority’s order, which were in favor of homebuyers.
UPRERA Authority has imposed penalty of Rs 2.5 crore against 11 developers for failing to comply with the authority’s order, which were in favor of homebuyers.
A decision by the authority is a fundamental step towards constraining the real estate agents from exploiting extra money from buyers and sellers. The brokerage being fixed will turn down the chances of overcharging ultimately protecting the interest of homebuyers.
IBC undoubtedly appears to be a better alternative in comparison to RERA. IBC offers a time bound resolution of the grievance of the homebuyers.
A milestone judgement by the MahaRERA Authority to ensure the development of the real estate industry by protecting the homebuyer’s interest by balancing the rights of homebuyers as well as project developers.
The HRERA issued directions that promoters should get their accounts audited within six months after the end of every financial year.
The government of Madhya Pradesh had amended RERA state rules for the appointment and issued a gazette notification regarding the same.
The UP-RERA Authority has ordered to revoke the registration of these existing developers whose projects have been standing-out for more than one year.
The Haryana government amends the Haryana Rera rules in order to bring the power of refund within the purview of Rera authority established at Panchkula and Gurgaon
UP RERA has imposed a fine amounting to Rs.1 Crore on ANSAL API for the non-compliance of orders passed by the authority.
Under Section 40 (1) of the RERA Act 2016, the authority can issue recovery warrants against developer who failed to comply with its order to refund home buyers.
The RERA laws explicitly says that the appropriate government shall only make rules for the smooth functioning of the act and it does not say anything about States powers to dilute the Central law.
The RERA authority of Maharashtra ordered a builder to refund an amount of Rs. 1.8 Crore to a homebuyer because after the passage of two years the builder failed to register agreement to sale and had already charged 30% of the price.
While dismissing the complaint the authority observed that both the Section i.e. 12 and 18 operate at two separate times of the transaction.
After the implementation of the RERA Act, the State of Gujarat has notified its final Gujarat RERA Rules, 2017 on 29.10.2016 which prescribes regulation, form and process.
Filing of RERA complaint as an association is feasible when there are common grievances to be redressed for.