Application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution can be rejected if statement is misleading
A article on how to rectify defects if any in the application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process along with case laws.
A article on how to rectify defects if any in the application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process along with case laws.
Steps that can be initiated by corporate creditors against their debtors in case of default and when the debtor refuses to accept the notice and come to a settlement.
In this article we will discuss about the fast track method of filing an application under corporate insolvency resolution process.
In this article we have discussed about how an Operational creditor can file an application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Process against it debtors.
The scheme as provided under the Code stipulates a mechanism wherein the Insolvency Resolution Process is reckoned upon any default upon non-payment of debt due.
Based on the experience in other countries restructuring of corporate debt and need for a similar mechanism in India, a Corporate Debt Restructuring System was evolved, and detailed guidelines were issued.
The secret to any successful business is good customer relations. Don’t allow too much time to pass without notifying your client that credit terms have been broken.
The directors of the suspended corporate debtor filed an appeal against the National Company Law Tribunal’s (“NCLT”) ruling that rejected their request to have a non-bailable warrant issued against them.
The fast track process which can be initiated by a creditor or the corporate debtor itself cuts down the time taken to complete an insolvency resolution to almost half as compared to the regular process under the IBC.
The lease premium and rent given to the Corporate Debtor are not included in Section 14(1)(D) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
the Resolution Professional could have included their claims as liabilities to the Corporate Debtor in the Information Memorandum created in accordance with Regulation 36 of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) Regulations.
The Corporate Debtor would carry on construction and out of total saleable construction 32% will be of landowner and remaining 68% will be of the Corporate Debtor.
The Successful Resolution Applicant requested Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (hereinafter referred to as MIDC) for a new water connection to revive the operations at the plant of the Corporate Debtor.
The court fined the suspended director of the corporate debtor (the applicant) Rs. 1 lakh for starting several legal actions to obtain the same remedy and wasting valuable judicial time.
A change in the composition of the Committee of Creditors (CoC) of the Corporate Debtor will affect its previous decision and the same will be binding on the newly included members of CoC.