The Lucknow bench after hearing a series of complaints against Ansal’s in particular, it has ordered for the forensic audit of the builder, as the bench thinks the homebuyer is genuine hence it has put restrictions upon the activities of the Ansal.
Filing of complaint is the first step in getting justice but as they say well begun is half done thus if filling is done efficiently justice cannot be left far behind.
Western UP Bench of RERA- After looking at the bulk cases in the state a bench was made operational in the city of Noida on 4th September, 2018.
300 cases in the matter of incomplete projects and more than 3,340 complaints of buyers relating to more than 722 projects under Uttar Pradesh RERA.
The builders started offering alternate flats or apartments instead of the original one promised as this trick is now becoming the norm for many builders.
Subvention Scheme, which supports the home buyer financially to invest in a property. But are these schemes even benefitting the home buyers or causing great losses to them.
In the cases against Ansal API Group one of the member Mr. Balwinder Singh has ordered Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. to dispose off the grievances of the allottee within a week.
The delay in projects got converted from months to years shattering the dream of owning a home of many homebuyers. A detailed article on how to get refund from the builders under RERA.
The huge number of complaints are coming across, wherein the money of the innocent home buyers is stuck with the abandoned or stalled projects.
RERA has been made as the singular authority to deal with the grievances arising out of the real estate sector but there still exists a question. a brief article on NCDRC or RERA.
The RERA Act mandated registration with the newly formulated state RERA authorities but the rebate was given to projects which have already procured occupation and completion certificates.
Some points have been discussed by Gurugram Bench of Haryana RERA has, in the case where the basic principle regarding the registration of project with RERA has been decided.
Delayed possessions or no possessions at all and even in cases where apartments were given the amenities promised were lacking or not at all present in the developed projects.
MAHARERA decided that complaint is not maintainable as the Complainant has cancelled the booking in March 2016 RERA Act, 2016 came into force.
The builders are taking force-majeure clause in the agreement as an excuse to escape their liabilities and get rid of the demanded claims.
join For Updates